Chinese French German English
Welcome to E2E Engineer Discussion Forum Sign in | Join | Help

Welcome to the E2E Community Discussion Forum!

  • You are among the first to view this thought-provoking and educational networking tool for design engineers looking to discuss integrating electrical components into their products.
  • The forum is open to all who seek, or wish to share useful and meaningful information.
  • We encourage constructive dialog and independent thinking free from promotional innuendo.
  • For more information on the rules and guidelines, read our discussion forum guidelines

Re: US Engineers not as well trained as Asian Engineers?!

  •  07-19-2005, 10:50 AM

    Re: US Engineers not as well trained as Asian Engineers?!

    If Lutz would stop treating his engineers as if they were business managers he would see a different outcome. Honestly, employees of all walks tend to become what their company wants them to be... for obvious reason$. To be their "best", an employee must be rewarded for doing and being their best. Each of us needs to push back too but corporate tolerance for this is generally low.

    US training may reflect an emphasis on "the business of business" more now than in years past but that is not the limit of a modern engineers training. Also, the business model used by a company like GM influences much more of society than it appears Mr. Lutz is willing to take responsibility for. Industry trends drive educational emphasis. If he wants his engineers to be more like european or asian style engineers then he could start by treating his current engineers like engineers.

    Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. - Albert Einstein (trad.)

    Star_E
View Complete Thread
Powered by Community Server, by Telligent Systems